Key Takeaways
- Section 144C creates a special two-stage assessment for an eligible assessee. The Assessing Officer must first pass a draft order if proposing any variation prejudicial to the assessee, not a final order straight away.
- An eligible assessee is (a) any person where a variation arises from the Transfer Pricing Officer's order under Section 92CA(3), and (b) a non-resident not being a company, or a foreign company.
- On receiving the draft order, you have 30 days to do one of two things: accept the variation, or file objections with the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) and the Assessing Officer.
- The DRP is a collegium of three Principal Commissioners or Commissioners. It issues binding directions within 9 months from the end of the month the draft order is forwarded. It can confirm, reduce, or enhance the variation but cannot set aside or remand.
- After DRP directions, the AO completes the final assessment within 1 month from the end of the month the directions are received, with no further hearing.
- If you do not respond within 30 days, the AO proceeds to pass the final assessment order, which then follows the normal appeal route to CIT(A) and ITAT.
- DRP proceedings are now faceless under the CBDT Faceless DRP scheme.
What is a Section 144C draft assessment order? A Section 144C draft assessment order is a provisional order an Assessing Officer must pass before finalising an assessment of an eligible assessee where any variation prejudicial to the assessee is proposed. It gives the assessee 30 days to accept the variation or file objections with the Dispute Resolution Panel before the final order is passed.
If you are a foreign company, a non-resident, or any taxpayer where the Transfer Pricing Officer has proposed an adjustment to your income, you will not receive a normal assessment order. You receive a draft assessment order under Section 144C first. This single procedural difference changes your entire response strategy: it opens a fast, specialised dispute route through the Dispute Resolution Panel that runs in parallel to the ordinary appeal system.
Section 144C is one of the most misunderstood provisions in Indian income tax practice. Assessees often treat the draft order as if it were a final demand and either pay up or miss the 30-day window, losing access to the DRP route entirely. Others assume the draft order is appealable on its own, which it is not. Getting the procedure right is the difference between a binding direction in your favour within a fixed timeline and a multi-year appeal grind.
This guide explains who qualifies as an eligible assessee, what a draft order is and is not, the two options available on receiving it, how the DRP works and what its directions can and cannot do, the exact statutory timelines, and what happens if you do nothing within 30 days.
Looking for expert help with Section 144C draft assessment order Dispute Resolution Panel DRP income tax India? The team at Tax Garden, based in Kondapur, Hyderabad, helps Indian SMEs stay compliant end-to-end: filings, notices, and advisory, all in one place.
Why Section 144C Exists
Section 144C was inserted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2009 to create a faster, specialised dispute resolution mechanism for transfer pricing and non-resident assessments. Before this provision, a taxpayer facing a large transfer pricing adjustment had to first pay or contest a final demand and then climb the regular appeal ladder, a process that often took five to ten years for cross-border disputes.
The objective was to give certain categories of taxpayers, especially foreign companies and multinationals facing transfer pricing variations, an opportunity to challenge a proposed addition before it crystallises into an enforceable demand. The Dispute Resolution Panel sits between the draft order and the final order, reviewing the proposed variation on a fixed clock.
Who Is an "Eligible Assessee" Under Section 144C?
The draft-order procedure applies only to an eligible assessee. This is a defined term, and the entire Section 144C machinery is triggered only when the assessee falls within the definition. Under Section 144C(15)(b), an eligible assessee means:
-
Any person in whose case a variation arises as a consequence of the order of the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) passed under Section 92CA(3). This covers Indian companies, LLPs, partnerships, and individuals, regardless of residential status, the moment a TPO adjustment is involved.
-
A non-resident not being a company, or a foreign company, where the Assessing Officer proposes any variation prejudicial to the assessee, even without a transfer pricing adjustment.
The practical effect is that two very different groups land in the same procedure: a domestic company hit with a transfer pricing adjustment, and a foreign company or non-resident facing any prejudicial variation in its Indian income assessment.
A resident company without a TPO variation is not an eligible assessee. If there is no transfer pricing order under Section 92CA(3), a resident corporate or individual taxpayer falls outside Section 144C and receives an ordinary final assessment order with the usual CIT(A) appeal route. Section 144C is not a general assessment provision.
What Is a Draft Assessment Order?
When the Assessing Officer proposes any variation in the income or loss returned by an eligible assessee that is prejudicial to that assessee, the AO cannot pass a final assessment order in the first instance. Instead, under Section 144C(1), the AO must forward a draft of the proposed order of assessment to the eligible assessee.
A draft order has three defining features:
- It is provisional. It is not a demand. No tax is payable purely because a draft order has been issued, and no recovery proceedings can be initiated on the strength of a draft order alone.
- It is not directly appealable. You cannot file an appeal before the CIT(A) or the ITAT against a draft order. Only the final order, passed later, is appealable.
- It triggers the 30-day clock. From the date the assessee receives the draft order, a 30-day window opens for the assessee to act.
The draft order sets out the proposed additions or adjustments, typically the transfer pricing variation computed by the TPO or the additions proposed by the AO in a non-resident or foreign-company case, along with reasons. It is, in effect, a formal proposal that the assessee gets to contest before it becomes binding.
The Two Options on Receiving a Draft Order
Section 144C(2) gives the eligible assessee exactly 30 days from the date of receipt of the draft order to choose one of two paths.
The 30-day clock is strict. The window runs from the date of receipt of the draft order. Once it expires, you lose the right to approach the DRP, and the AO proceeds to finalise the assessment. There is no general power to condone delay in filing objections before the DRP.
Option 1: Accept the Variation
The assessee can intimate acceptance of the variation to the Assessing Officer within 30 days. Acceptance can be express (a written acceptance) or can result from simply not filing any objection within the 30-day window.
If the assessee accepts, the matter goes back to the AO to pass the final order incorporating the accepted variation.
Option 2: File Objections With the DRP
The assessee can file objections to the variation. The objections must be filed with both:
- The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP), and
- The Assessing Officer
within the 30-day window. Filing objections with the DRP is what keeps the matter out of the AO's hands for finalisation and routes the dispute to the panel. This is the path most foreign companies and transfer-pricing assessees take when they genuinely contest the proposed addition.
The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP): Composition and Powers
The DRP is not a single officer. Under Section 144C(15)(a), the DRP is a collegium of three Principal Commissioners or Commissioners of Income-tax, constituted by the CBDT. This three-member structure is intended to bring a degree of seniority and collective judgment to the review of a proposed variation.
What the DRP Can Do
After receiving objections, the DRP examines the draft order, the objections, the evidence, the TPO's order (where relevant), the records of the assessment, and may make further enquiry. Under Section 144C(8), the DRP can:
- Confirm the variation, or
- Reduce the variation, or
- Enhance the variation.
The power to enhance is significant: filing objections is not risk-free. The DRP can examine any matter arising out of the assessment proceedings, even an issue not raised by the assessee in its objections, and can direct an enhancement of the proposed addition.
What the DRP Cannot Do
Critically, the DRP cannot set aside the variation or the draft order, and it cannot remand the matter back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment. This is an express restriction. The panel must decide the issues before it and issue directions; it cannot send the file back for another round. This restriction is what keeps the DRP route fast compared with the regular appellate process.
DRP Directions Are Binding on the AO
Under Section 144C(10), the directions issued by the DRP are binding on the Assessing Officer. The AO has no discretion to disagree. Once the DRP issues its directions, the AO must give effect to them in the final assessment order. This binding character is the core advantage of the DRP route over a normal appeal, where the AO's order stands until an appellate authority overturns it.
Section 144C Timelines
Section 144C runs on fixed statutory clocks. Missing or tracking these timelines is central to handling a draft order correctly.
| Stage | Trigger event | Statutory time limit |
|---|---|---|
| Draft order issued | AO proposes a prejudicial variation for an eligible assessee | Before any final order; mandatory first step |
| Assessee's response window | Date of receipt of the draft order | 30 days to accept or file objections |
| DRP directions | End of the month in which the draft order is forwarded to the assessee | Within 9 months |
| Final order (objections filed, DRP route) | End of the month in which the DRP directions are received by the AO | Within 1 month; no further hearing |
| Final order (acceptance or no objection) | End of the month in which the 30-day objection period expires | Within 1 month |
How to Read the "End of the Month" Rule
The timelines are computed from the end of the month in which the triggering event occurs, not from the exact date. Two worked illustrations:
- DRP directions issued in March. The AO must pass the final assessment order within 1 month from the end of March, that is, by 30 April, without giving the assessee any further hearing.
- No objection filed; 30-day window expires in March. The AO must pass the final order within 1 month from the end of March, again by 30 April.
For the DRP itself, if the draft order is forwarded to the assessee in, say, April, the DRP must issue its directions within 9 months from the end of April, that is, by 31 January of the following year.
No further hearing after DRP directions. Once the DRP issues directions, the AO simply gives effect to them. The assessee is not entitled to a fresh hearing before the AO at the final-order stage. Your entire case before the panel must therefore be made fully and in writing during the DRP proceedings.
What Happens if You Do Not Respond Within 30 Days?
This is the most consequential question for any assessee holding a draft order. If you neither accept nor file objections with the DRP within the 30-day window, Section 144C(3) takes over:
- The Assessing Officer treats the absence of objection as the position being uncontested at the DRP stage and proceeds to complete the assessment.
- The AO passes the final assessment order on the basis of the draft order, within 1 month from the end of the month in which the 30-day acceptance period expires.
- The DRP route is now closed. You cannot approach the panel after the window lapses.
- Your only remaining remedy is the ordinary appeal route: appeal the final order before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), CIT(A), and thereafter the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT).
In short, not responding does not make the proposed addition go away. It converts a fast, binding-direction route into the slower regular appeal ladder, and you forfeit the structural advantages of the DRP, including the binding nature of its directions and the fixed timeline.
Missing the 30-day window does not reduce the addition; it removes your best procedural option. The variation proposed in the draft order is carried into the final order, a demand is raised, and you must then contest it through CIT(A) and ITAT, often over several years, while interest accrues. Treat the 30-day clock as a hard deadline.
DRP Route vs CIT(A) Appeal Route
When you file objections with the DRP, your appeal against the final order (passed to give effect to the DRP directions) lies directly with the ITAT, not with the CIT(A). This is a key structural difference. The comparison below sets out how the two routes differ.
Comparison
DRP Route vs CIT(A) Appeal Route
Two different paths to contest a proposed addition
| Parameter | DRP Route (Section 144C) | CIT(A) Appeal Route |
|---|---|---|
| When it applies | Eligible assessee: TPO variation, or non-resident / foreign company | Any assessee against a final assessment order |
| What you contest | The draft order, before it becomes final | The final assessment order, after demand is raised |
| Forum | Collegium of three Pr. Commissioners / Commissioners | Single Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) |
| Time to file | 30 days from receipt of draft order | Generally 30 days from receipt of demand notice |
| Decision timeline | Directions within 9 months from end of month draft forwarded | No fixed statutory disposal timeline in practice |
| Effect on AO | Directions are binding on the AO | CIT(A) order can be further appealed by both sides |
| Power to set aside / remand | Cannot set aside or remand; only confirm, reduce, or enhance | Wider appellate powers, including remand in some cases |
| Risk of enhancement | DRP can enhance the variation | CIT(A) can also enhance after notice |
| Next appeal level | Appeal against final order lies to the ITAT | Appeal against CIT(A) order lies to the ITAT |
| Demand during process | No final demand until final order is passed | Final demand already raised; stay may be needed |
Source: Section 144C and Section 246A, Income Tax Act 1961
The DRP route is generally preferred where it is available, because it lets you contest the addition before any demand is raised and because the panel's directions bind the AO. The trade-off is the risk of enhancement and the absence of a power to remand, which means your case must be complete and well documented from the outset.
Faceless Assessment and the Faceless DRP
Section 144C now operates within the faceless regime. Draft assessment orders for eligible assessees are passed under the faceless assessment framework, and the DRP itself functions under the Faceless Dispute Resolution Panel scheme notified by the CBDT.
Under the faceless DRP scheme:
- Objections are filed and proceedings are conducted electronically, through the income tax portal, without physical interface with the panel.
- The identity of the panel members and the territorial jurisdiction are de-emphasised in favour of automated, anonymised allocation.
- Personal hearings, where permitted, are conducted through video conferencing.
The substantive structure of Section 144C, including the 30-day window, the binding nature of DRP directions, the 9-month directions timeline, and the bar on setting aside or remand, continues unchanged under the faceless framework. Faceless processing changes the mode of interaction, not the rights and timelines under the section.
Practical Sequence: How a Section 144C Case Unfolds
For an eligible assessee, the lifecycle of a Section 144C matter typically runs as follows:
- TPO order or proposed variation. The Transfer Pricing Officer passes an order under Section 92CA(3), or the AO proposes a prejudicial variation in a non-resident or foreign-company case.
- Draft order forwarded. The AO forwards the draft assessment order to the eligible assessee. The 30-day clock starts on receipt.
- Decision point. Within 30 days, the assessee either accepts the variation or files objections with the DRP and the AO.
- DRP proceedings. If objections are filed, the three-member DRP examines the record, may call for further enquiry, and issues binding directions within 9 months from the end of the month the draft was forwarded.
- Final order. The AO passes the final assessment order: within 1 month from the end of the month the DRP directions are received (objection route), or within 1 month from the end of the month the 30-day period expires (acceptance or no objection).
- Appeal. Where the DRP route was taken, the appeal against the final order lies to the ITAT. Where no objection was filed, the appeal route runs through CIT(A) and then the ITAT.
Document everything during the DRP stage. Because the DRP cannot remand and the AO gives no further hearing after directions, the DRP stage is your single best opportunity to put the complete factual record, transfer pricing documentation, comparables analysis, and legal submissions on file. Anything left out is difficult to introduce later.
Common Mistakes With Section 144C Draft Orders
- Treating the draft order as a final demand. A draft order raises no demand. Paying it or panicking over recovery is misplaced; the right response is to evaluate the 30-day options.
- Letting the 30-day window lapse. Missing the window closes the DRP route permanently and forces you onto the slower CIT(A) and ITAT path.
- Filing objections with only the DRP or only the AO. Section 144C(2) requires objections to be filed with both the DRP and the Assessing Officer. Filing with one alone can compromise the objection.
- Trying to appeal the draft order. The draft order is not appealable. An appeal can be filed only against the final order.
- Underestimating the enhancement risk. Because the DRP can enhance the variation, objections should be prepared with the same rigour as a substantive appeal, not as a formality.
- Leaving evidence for later. With no remand power at the DRP and no further hearing before the AO, the record must be complete at the objection stage.
What Changes Under the Income Tax Act 2025
The Income Tax Act 2025 re-codifies the Income Tax Act 1961, including the assessment and dispute-resolution machinery. The draft-assessment and Dispute Resolution Panel framework currently in Section 144C is carried forward into a corresponding provision under the new Act, and the faceless DRP continues to operate.
The substantive features that practitioners rely on, the eligible-assessee definition, the mandatory draft order for prejudicial variations, the 30-day response window, the three-member DRP collegium, the binding nature of DRP directions, the bar on set-aside or remand, and the 9-month and 1-month timelines, are expected to continue in substance. For assessments and draft orders issued before the new Act takes effect, the existing Section 144C numbering applies. For the precise new section number under the Income Tax Act 2025, confirm against the notified text before citing it in a filing.
Tax Garden Can Help
Responding to a draft assessment order under Section 144C is time-bound and technical. The 30-day window, the dual filing with the DRP and the AO, the enhancement risk, and the need for a complete documented record all have to be handled correctly the first time. Tax Garden helps eligible assessees, foreign companies, non-residents, and businesses facing transfer pricing variations, prepare a documented, evidence-backed response to a draft order and guides you through the DRP process and the statutory timelines. Our tax compliance services cover reviewing the draft order, organising transfer pricing documentation and comparables, drafting the objections, tracking the DRP and final-order deadlines, and reconciling the final order against the DRP directions. Note that representation before the assessing and appellate authorities is undertaken by qualified Chartered Accountants and advocates; our role is to help you prepare and organise a robust response and to guide you through each procedural step.
Looking for expert help with Section 144C draft assessment order DRP objections and timelines guide? The team at Tax Garden, based in Kondapur, Hyderabad, helps Indian SMEs stay compliant end-to-end: filings, notices, and advisory, all in one place.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a draft assessment order under Section 144C?
It is a provisional order an Assessing Officer must pass before finalising the assessment of an eligible assessee where any variation prejudicial to the assessee is proposed. It is not a demand and is not directly appealable. It gives the assessee 30 days to either accept the variation or file objections with the Dispute Resolution Panel and the Assessing Officer before the final order is passed.
Who is an eligible assessee under Section 144C?
Two categories. First, any person (resident or non-resident, company or otherwise) in whose case a variation arises from the Transfer Pricing Officer's order under Section 92CA(3). Second, a non-resident not being a company, or a foreign company, where the Assessing Officer proposes any variation prejudicial to the assessee. A resident company without a TPO variation is not an eligible assessee.
How long do I have to respond to a Section 144C draft order?
30 days from the date you receive the draft order. Within that window you must either intimate acceptance of the variation to the Assessing Officer, or file objections with both the Dispute Resolution Panel and the Assessing Officer. The 30-day window is strict, and missing it closes the DRP route.
What can the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) do with my objections?
The DRP is a collegium of three Principal Commissioners or Commissioners. After examining the draft order, your objections, and the record, it can confirm, reduce, or enhance the proposed variation. It cannot set aside the order or remand the matter back to the Assessing Officer. Its directions are binding on the Assessing Officer.
What are the timelines under Section 144C?
The assessee has 30 days to respond to the draft order. The DRP must issue its directions within 9 months from the end of the month in which the draft order is forwarded. The Assessing Officer must pass the final order within 1 month from the end of the month the DRP directions are received, or, where no objection is filed, within 1 month from the end of the month the 30-day period expires.
What happens if I do not respond to the draft order within 30 days?
The Assessing Officer proceeds to pass the final assessment order on the basis of the draft order within 1 month from the end of the month the 30-day period expires. The DRP route is closed. Your only remedy is then the ordinary appeal route through the CIT(A) and the ITAT. Not responding does not remove the proposed addition.
Is a draft assessment order appealable?
No. A draft order under Section 144C is not directly appealable before the CIT(A) or the ITAT. Only the final assessment order is appealable. Where you have taken the DRP route, the appeal against the final order lies directly to the ITAT rather than to the CIT(A).
Are DRP proceedings faceless?
Yes. The Dispute Resolution Panel operates under the CBDT Faceless DRP scheme. Objections are filed and proceedings are conducted electronically through the income tax portal, and any personal hearing is held by video conferencing. The faceless framework changes the mode of interaction but not the 30-day window, the 9-month directions timeline, or the binding nature of DRP directions.
Work with the Trusted Tax & Compliance Services in Kondapur, Hyderabad - Tax Garden for expert GST filing, ITR, TDS, ROC, and startup compliance support.
Frequently Asked Questions: Tax Services in Kondapur & Hyderabad
What makes Tax Garden a preferred GST consultant in Kondapur?
Tax Garden is ISO 9001:2015 certified and backs every engagement with Kavach, our ₹50,000 error-protection cover. Our flat-fee, no-surprise pricing and dedicated account manager make us a compliance partner for startups and SMEs in Kondapur's HITEC City corridor.
Why is Tax Garden a trusted tax compliance partner in Hyderabad?
Trust comes from three pillars at Tax Garden. First, transparency: you know the exact fee before you sign up, and it never changes mid-year. Second, certified expertise: our compliance team is qualified, and the firm holds ISO 9001:2015 certification. Third, accountability: Kavach, our unique error-protection plan, covers up to ₹50,000 in service charges for any clerical mistake made by our team.
Is there a reliable tax consultant near me in Kondapur?
Yes. Tax Garden's office is in Kondapur itself (CWS One Building, Hanuman Nagar). You can book an in-person consultation or get everything done fully online via WhatsApp and our client portal. We serve walk-in clients by appointment and remote clients across all of Hyderabad and Telangana.
I want a friendly CA who explains things clearly. Is that Tax Garden?
Absolutely. Every client gets a dedicated account manager reachable on WhatsApp, plain-language explanations of what is filed and why, and proactive reminders before every deadline. No jargon, no surprises, just friendly, expert compliance support from Kondapur.
Where is Tax Garden located in Hyderabad?
Tax Garden is located at 4th Floor, South Block, CWS One Building, Hanuman Nagar, Kondapur, Hyderabad, Telangana 500084. We serve clients across Kondapur, HITEC City, Gachibowli, Madhapur, Jubilee Hills, Banjara Hills, and all of Hyderabad.
Can I get GST filing and registration services in Kondapur?
Yes. Tax Garden offers end-to-end GST services from our Kondapur office: GST registration, GSTR-1, GSTR-3B, GSTR-9 annual returns, ITC reconciliation, e-invoicing setup, and GST notice handling for businesses of all sizes in Kondapur and Hyderabad.
Do you file ITR for salaried employees and businesses in Hyderabad?
Yes. Our Kondapur team files ITR for salaried employees, freelancers, consultants, business owners, LLPs, and companies across Hyderabad. We cover ITR-1 through ITR-6 with complete Chapter VI-A deduction optimisation, AIS reconciliation, and advance tax planning.
Which areas in Hyderabad does Tax Garden serve?
Tax Garden's Kondapur office serves clients across Hyderabad including HITEC City, Gachibowli, Madhapur, Jubilee Hills, Banjara Hills, Begumpet, Secunderabad, Ameerpet, Kukatpally, Uppal, LB Nagar, and all of Telangana. Most services are available fully online.
What compliance services does Tax Garden offer for startups in Kondapur?
Tax Garden is a compliance partner for startups in Kondapur and Hyderabad's HITEC City corridor. We handle company incorporation, GST registration, TDS filings, payroll, ROC annual filings, director KYC, and annual ITR filing, all under one flat-fee plan.
How is Tax Garden different from traditional accountants and tax firms in Hyderabad?
Unlike traditional accounting practices that charge hourly and are difficult to reach, Tax Garden operates on flat-fee subscription plans with a dedicated account manager, monthly compliance updates, and WhatsApp-first communication. Our AI-powered workflow catches errors before filings are submitted, and Kavach error-protection ensures you are never left alone if something goes wrong.
Sources
This guide is verified against incometax.gov.in (Income Tax Department, Section 144C of the Income Tax Act 1961, "Reference to Dispute Resolution Panel", including the eligible-assessee definition under Section 144C(15), the draft-order requirement under Section 144C(1), the 30-day response window under Section 144C(2)-(3), the DRP's powers to confirm, reduce, or enhance and the bar on setting aside or remand under Section 144C(8), the binding nature of directions under Section 144C(10), and the 9-month directions timeline), the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2009 (insertion of Section 144C), Section 92CA(3) of the Income Tax Act 1961 (Transfer Pricing Officer's order), the CBDT notification constituting the e-Dispute Resolution Panel / Faceless DRP scheme under the faceless assessment framework, Section 246A of the Income Tax Act 1961 (appealable orders), and the Income Tax Act 2025 (re-codification of the assessment and dispute-resolution provisions). Confirmatory secondary coverage was reviewed from ClearTax (Section 144C and DRP guide), Taxmann (Dispute Resolution Panel commentary), and the IndiaFilings knowledge base (draft assessment order under Section 144C). Practitioners should verify the exact corresponding section number under the Income Tax Act 2025 against the notified text before citing it in a filing.